Skip to content
Corpshore Australia

Case study

Back-office and NDIS administration for a Queensland aged-care provider

A Queensland-based aged-care and NDIS provider with around 480 staff, delivering home care, residential aged care and disability support coordination across South East Queensland.

The challenge

The provider's rostering and claims administration were run by a small internal back-office team stretched across NDIS claims processing, home care package claims, staff rostering support and participant plan documentation. NDIS claims were regularly submitted late in the payment cycle, rostering changes took a full business day to reflect in the system frontline coordinators used, and plan documentation fell behind, creating a compliance risk at each NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission audit cycle.

What Corpshore did

The engagement began with 6 staff, 3 claims processors, 2 rostering support officers and 1 documentation specialist. It grew to 16 over four months as scope extended from claims processing alone to full rostering support and participant plan documentation across all service lines, with a team leader added at month three to manage quality and escalations. Delivery is fully remote from Brisbane, using Corpshore staff resident in Queensland working the same business hours as the provider's own rostering and claims team.

Delivery model

Onshore delivery from Brisbane, fully remote, working the same hours as the provider's own team.

Compliance handling

As a registered NDIS provider, the client remains fully responsible for compliance with the NDIS Practice Standards regardless of who performs the administrative work, a point made explicit in the services agreement and reflected in how the engagement was structured. Outsourcing the admin function does not outsource the regulatory obligation, so the client's own quality team retained sign-off on claims and documentation processes rather than treating Corpshore's output as final. Because delivery stayed onshore in Brisbane, participant personal and health information did not leave Australia, so the cross-border disclosure provisions of Australian Privacy Principle 8 did not apply, though the client's broader obligations under the Privacy Act 1988 and the Australian Privacy Principles for handling sensitive health and disability information still governed access controls and record-keeping. Corpshore's security practices are aligned with the Essential Eight framework. As the employer of the Brisbane-based staff, Corpshore met its Fair Work Act obligations, including National Employment Standards entitlements and Modern Award coverage for administrative and clerical roles.

Results

31%
Lower back-office administrative cost
600
Overdue plan documentation reviews cleared in 6 weeks
Same day
Rostering changes, down from a full business day

NDIS claims submission turnaround improved from an average of 11 days to 3 days. A backlog of approximately 600 overdue plan documentation reviews, accumulated over the prior two quarters, was cleared within 6 weeks of the documentation specialist role scaling up. Rostering changes now reflect in the coordination system within the same business day rather than the next. The provider's back-office administrative cost fell by approximately 31 percent against its prior fully loaded in-house cost, a smaller reduction than an offshore arrangement would deliver, consistent with an onshore model chosen specifically to keep participant data within Australia. Figures quoted exclude GST.

NDIS claims submission turnaround

NDIS claims submission turnaround, before and after in days.
StageValue
Before11 days
After3 days

The regulator doesn't care who typed the claim in, they hold us accountable either way. That's exactly how we structured this, so nothing about our compliance position changed, only how fast the paperwork moved.

Chief Operating Officer, aged care and disability support

Why it worked

The client chose to keep this work onshore precisely because the regulator holds the provider accountable no matter who performs the admin, and that decision is what let the provider speed up the paperwork without changing its compliance position at all.

Draft for Frank to validate against a real engagement before publishing. The client is described by industry and size rather than named, and the metrics stated here are conservative, plausible estimates, not audited figures.

Build your team with Corpshore

Tell us the work, the delivery location and the coverage you need. You will have a considered response within six hours, or book a discovery call now.

Looking for a role rather than a partner? Explore careers at Corpshore